Textbooks vs. Hypertext

In Chapter 17, Pedagogy and Hypertext, Gibson talks about how educational institutions had a hard time accepting hypertext and digital learning tools in the 1990s. She describes The University of Maryland, Baltimore County, saying that they did not build a computer science building because they felt it would not attract students. She goes on to say, "Those people who were attracted to the study of computers went on to design computer programs that now invisibly pervade our everyday lives. ATMs, Game Boys, palm pilots, cell phones, Nintendos, cars that think, appliances that make phone calls, and the Internet itself, to name just a few manifestations, are integral parts of American life." (p.278) Later in the chapter she discusses the transition from traditional textbooks in the classroom to hypertext and digital learning tools. Gibson says that there are two extreme ways of looking at textbooks, either as a driving force behind curriculum decisions or as simple tools for classroom interaction. She goes on to describe the possibility of hypertext replacing textbooks, saying it could provide a more comprehensive and interactive coverage of subjects. She says, "an oft-heard comment during a summer workshop, and since, is that hyptertext is a way to hold student interest. It is dynamic, contains several approaches to the material, and appears to give readers/users a choice about how the material will be experienced and studied." (p.287)

I think hypertext has huge potential in the academic world. It is a powerful tool that allows teachers to best meet the needs of each individual student. On the other hand, it would be sad to see all books go digital. There is something unique about opening a new book, turning pages as you read, and physically seeing yourself progress through the book.